I read Philip Pullman's acclaimed diegesis at the suggestion of another friend, Wyn Boerckel. This one's for you.
My first memory of His Dark Materials
originated in junior high. Ben Henderson--who now has a
wonderful blog up and running--was contentedly perusing the second book in the series,
The Subtle Knife. The poetic feel of the title perked my interest, and I voiced my query.
"The subtle knife?" I asked, innocently voicing the b.
I'm not certain if he ever looked up. "It's subtle. 'Suh-tul,'" Ben replied coyly. I then left, cursing my luck being deprived of phonics classes. After that, however, thoughts about the series never entered my mind. I just wasn't interested in it, even when the movie premiered and drew a firestorm of religious criticism.
When Wyn (heh, heh, heh) suggested I read it, I thought it would be a wonderful break from Frankenstein, which I have already read.
And, after finishing the series, I can now say I was right not to take notice of these rather uninteresting books.
Let's begin. I'll try to tackle these books like this: a brief overview, a literary analysis, and finally a biblical take.
The story follows Lyra Belacqua, a pathological liar (evidenced by the honorary title "Silvertongue" [not in reference to her actual silver tongue, which is valued at over $600 at auction]) in a coming-of-age story; she travels to the arctic, travels to another world, lies, travels to yet another world, lies some more, frees the souls of the dead; she becomes the new Eve, and other stuff. I was slightly confused most of the time. To put it plainly,
". . .the plot is about as twisted and impenetrable as a granite octopus. . ." I just didn't know what was happening--but maybe that was the point.
An integral portion of the story resides in a person's daemon, a manifestation of a person's soul in a familiar, usually in the shape of a mouse, bird, or cat. Sometimes a monkey.
(I was infinitely disheartened to find no mention of a beaver daemon; this, no doubt, contributed to my disillusionment.)
Other notable characters include Will, Serafina Pekkala, Lee Scoresby, an armored bear, homosexual angels, and Mrs. Coulter, who is more confused about her moral alignment than
Sylar in the TV show
Heroes.
I really have no problems with Pullman's literary devices. However, about half-way through the second book, I realized Pullman uses the word breast gratuitously. He seems to have a bizarre infatuation with that word, even though he uses it platonically. It's like he yearned for an appropriately poignant word to describe an emotional situation in the first novel, forgot he just used it, and subsequently repeated the entire process for each chapter of the next two books. I'm imagining a meeting between Pullman and one of his editors...
EDITOR: "Mr. Pullman, you've used the word breast, like, five times in this paragraph. Should we use a different word? There's chest, and heart, and soul, and--"
PULLMAN ignores him pulls out plastic knife and repeatedly tries to cut EDITOR'S sleeve to no avail.
EDITOR: "Mr. Pullman, what are you doing?"
PULLMAN: "I hold the subtle knife! Your arm should be clean off! Yar!"
Word choice aside, I found myself able to tolerate the erratic happenings in the story until the conclusion, where Lyra and Will (an addendum in the second book) begin snogging. Voraciously. We're not talking about adults or even teens--these children are in the 12-13 range. Even though it is an obvious allusion to Adam and Eve in
Paradise Lost, it was so strange. I felt alienated, confused, unsettled--similar to my first viewing of
The End of Evangelion. Hence, I threw the book away and declared the end of my relationship with the series.
Now, let's tackle the religious implications. In my exhaustive synopsis, I omitted the most controversial part of the story--deicide. God, is in fact the first evolved angel. (Perhaps, given enough time, angels would develop into Star-Childs.) His Dark Materials celebrates humanism with zeal and vigor.
This franchise is often viewed as the direct counter to C.S. Lewis's
The Chronicles of Narnia. If you would happen across Wikipedia's article on
Chronicles, you would discover that Pullman is by no means a fan of Lewis's works. I'm not sure why. Narnia had talking beavers.
Personally, I view this series as no different from all those philosophies out there which deny an existence of God (except packaged in a nice, neat little novel aimed at the future of the world). I know this is a gross generalization, but that's just the way my mind works.
I suppose, then, this series falls under the same category as Harry Potter. These books are an entertainment to read, but the foundations they are built on are Biblically unsound. And that's really all I have to say about that.
So if you want to read these books, more power to you. Just let me be as I go back to reading Jane Eyre.
So long, and thanks for reading.